Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mojo (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:23, 13 July 2023

Revision as of 20:16, 13 July 2023

Line 8:

*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|Technology]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|Computing]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|Software]]. [[User:Alexandermcnabb|Alexandermcnabb]] ([[User talk:Alexandermcnabb|talk]]) 13:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)</small>

*'''Week delete'''. InfoWorld seems fine. Others do not seem to be independent. Definitely has the feel of a promotional article, too. &mdash;[[User:Siroxo|siro]][[User talk:Siroxo|''&chi;'']][[Special:Contributions/Siroxo|o]] 14:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

*:Update, I am fine with draftify proposed below as well &mdash;[[User:Siroxo|siro]][[User talk:Siroxo|''&chi;'']][[Special:Contributions/Siroxo|o]] 20:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

* '''Keep'''. The sources are in the front: 2 infoworld, the register, and analytics india magazine. As far as I can tell they are all independent, reliable, and cover the language in depth, as required for [[WP:GNG]]. The fact that infoworld wrote about it again shows there is also [[WP:SUSTAINED]] coverage. There is more coverage too, they're just blogs and stuff that's not really reliable. But what is there seems sufficient, and I'm sure if something interesting happens, e.g. it goes out of beta, there will be another round of news coverage, allowing improvements in the article's tone and quality to make it less hype-y. [[User:Mathnerd314159|Mathnerd314159]] ([[User talk:Mathnerd314159|talk]]) 17:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)