Content deleted Content added
→Template-protected edit request on 3 August 2023: Not opposed, but seek consensus. |
|||
Line 69:
In addition, the link codes table in [[Module:Find sources/doc]] needs to be updated if this change is made, though the documentation does not appear to be template protected so I am happy to make said change myself. Thanks! [[User:Dylnuge|<span style="color: #1e79a1;font-weight:700;">Dylnuge</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dylnuge|''Talk'']] • [[Special:Contributions/Dylnuge|''Edits'']])</sup> 00:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
: Not opposed, but imho, this isn't the sort of thing that should just be added to the module as a simple response to an edit request (although I think it's fine to request it that way), but by broader [[WP:CONS|consensus]], as this would have a wide impact. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 08:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
::That makes sense to me! Two questions:
::# I want to make sure I really understand the change I proposed here, since I'm not generally familiar with modules. I was under the impression adding the link codes wouldn't impact existing templates, though looking more into it, it also seems like there's no configurability in the current templates so maybe adding the link codes is a useless no-op. Is the right thing here to seek consensus on the full change altogether (i.e. get consensus on adding one or both newswires to the find sources template before making any changes like adding them as options to the link codes list)?
::# Is the right place to seek consensus the VPR thread ([[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Replace nyt with reuters]])? Adding the sources to the default find sources does seem like a pretty major change, and I assume a handful of editors doesn't make a proper consensus for something like that.
::Thanks for your help here! [[User:Dylnuge|<span style="color: #1e79a1;font-weight:700;">Dylnuge</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dylnuge|''Talk'']] • [[Special:Contributions/Dylnuge|''Edits'']])</sup> 16:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
| |||