Revision as of 04:28, 22 March 2007 edit Gmaxwell (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,571 edits →"''claims to be'' unencumbered": reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:54, 10 March 2008 edit undo Jmvalin (talk \| contribs) 174 edits need rewrite Next edit →
Line 29: ** Keep in mind the [[Wikipedia:Article size\|official technical and stylistic recommendations for article size]]. If you're going to use advanced concepts to describe the algorithm, be sure to provide a reference (either a Wikipedia article or an external link) so that a novice can garner a basic understanding. You might also think about following the [[Wikipedia:Summary style\|summary style]] method and write a basic summary of the Speex algorithm then link to another article (e.g., [[Speex algorithm]]) where you go into more depth. Again, be sure to utilize links to other Wikipedia articles. I'm somewhat of a novice, so I can provide feedback. Thanks for Speex, by the way. —[[User:ShaneCavanaugh\|ShaneCavanaugh]] 22:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC) * I think the article in its current version is a mess. I see lots of people editing minor bits here and there, but what's needed a a near-complete rewrite. A while ago, someone basically copied random parts of the Speex manual, which is why it doesn't really look like an encyclopaedic entry. [[User:Jmvalin\|Jmvalin]] ([[User talk:Jmvalin\|talk]]) 23:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC) == "''claims to be'' unencumbered" ==

Talk:Speex: Difference between revisions