Crackpot index: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
improve lead based on information verifiable in later text
add an early claim about development of the list attributed to New Scientist publication
Line 12:
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html|title=Crackpot index|website=math.ucr.edu|access-date=2018-07-17}}</ref> An earlier version only had 17 questions with point values for each ranging from 1 to 40.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html|title=Crackpot index|date=1996-11-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19961110050053/http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html|access-date=2018-07-17|archive-date=1996-11-10}}</ref>
 
Baez confirmed in a 1993 letter toThe ''[[New Scientist]]'' published a claim in 1992 that hethe createdcreation of the index.<ref name=BaezNS>{{citewas "prompted by an especially magazinestriking
outburst from a retired mathematician insisting that TIME has INERTIA".<ref name=NSFeedback>{{cite magazine
| date = 5 December 1992
| title = Feedback
| url = https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13618508-100-feedback/
| magazine = [[New Scientist]]
| access-date = 2023-08-10
}}</ref>
Baez later confirmed in a 1993 letter to ''New Scientist'' that he created the index.<ref name=BaezNS>{{cite magazine
| last = Baez
| first = John