Content deleted Content added
→Books: Add Laland's 2017 book Darwin's Unfinished Symphony AND add subtitle to Henrich's book |
→Human sociobiology and evolutionary psychology: Some language was so absolutist as to be inaccurate and confusing. "But the changes are not random" to "But the changes are not usually random" (noise can induce random changes, whether that is literal noise in the case of spoken words or copying errors in the case of physical media) Another example is "Memes are not like genes" to "Memes are not precisely like genes" and "Genes are copied faithfully" to "Genes are normally copied faithfully". |
||
Line 137:
===Human sociobiology and evolutionary psychology===
Evolutionary psychologists study the evolved architecture of the human mind. They see it as composed of many different programs that process information, each with assumptions and procedures that were specialized by natural selection to solve a different adaptive problem faced by our hunter-gatherer ancestors (e.g., choosing mates, hunting, avoiding predators, cooperating, using aggression).<ref>Barkow, J., Cosmides, L, & Tooby, J. (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press.</ref> These evolved programs contain content-rich assumptions about how the world and other people work.
There is no necessary contradiction between evolutionary psychology and DIT, but evolutionary psychologists argue that the psychology implicit in many DIT models is too simple; evolved programs have a rich inferential structure not captured by the idea of a "content bias". They also argue that some of the phenomena DIT models attribute to cultural evolution are cases of "evoked culture"—situations in which different evolved programs are activated in different places, in response to cues in the environment.<ref>Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L., (1992) Psychological foundations of culture. In The Adapted Mind.</ref>
Human [[sociobiology|sociobiologists]] try to understand how maximizing genetic fitness, in either the modern era or past environments, can explain human behavior. When faced with a trait that seems maladaptive, some sociobiologists try to determine how the trait actually increases genetic fitness (maybe through kin selection or by speculating about early evolutionary environments). Dual inheritance theorists, in contrast, will consider a variety of genetic and cultural processes in addition to natural selection on genes.▼
▲
===Human behavioral ecology===
|