Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
InedibleHulk (talk | contribs) m →Primary sources should be used carefully: Morestraighforwardwithout. |
InedibleHulk (talk | contribs) →"Primary" does not mean "bad": This, in any words, seems more suitable for a section on how they should be used. |
||
Line 95:
Primary sources {{em|can}} be [[WP:Identifying reliable sources|reliable]], and they {{em|can}} be used. Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source, such as when you are supporting a direct [[WP:Manual of Style#Quotations|quotation]]. In such cases, the original document is the best source because the original document will be free of any errors or misquotations introduced by subsequent sources.
==Primary sources should be used carefully==
|