Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Oppose (Electoral Commission experience): no thank you |
|||
Line 370:
#Sounds like a supervote to me. It should be solely based on consensus, and that's all the closer should judge. [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 10:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
#I agree with {{u|Floquenbeam}} that it's important to get new blood, but community members are perfectly capable of doing that by endorsing new candidates should they decide that's important to them. [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 21:03, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
#It always works out. The community has done a phenomenal job for years. [[User:SQL|<span style="font-size:7pt;color: #fff;background:#900;border:2px solid #999">SQL</span>]][[User talk:SQL|<sup style="font-size: 5pt;color:#999">Query Me!</sup>]] 23:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
==== Comments (Electoral Commission experience) ====
| |||