Area code split: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Grammar and syntax
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
copyedit
Line 1:
{{short description|Method of central office code relief in the NANP}}
{{more citations needed|date=May 2021}}
In [[telecommunications]], an '''area code split''' is the practice of introducing a new telephone [[area code]] by geographically dividing an existing [[numbering plan area]] (NPA), and assigning area codes to the resulting divisions, but retaining the existing area code only for one of the divisions. The purpose of this practice is to provide more [[central office prefix]]es, and therefore more [[telephone number]]s, in an area with high demand for telephonetelecommunication services, and prevent a shortage of telephone numbers.
 
An increasing demand for telephone numbers has existed since the development of automatic telephony in the early 20th century, but was spurred especially since the 1990s, with the proliferation of fax machines, pager systems, mobile telephones, computer modems and, eventually, [[smart phone]]s.
 
WhenThe implementation of an area code split istypically implemented,involves the establishment of a [[Class-4 telephone numbersswitch|Class-4 intoll switching center]] for each division of the affectedexisting numbering plan area that receive a new area code. The local seven-digit telephone numbers in any of the areas are typically not changed. The existing central office prefixes are maintained and only the central offices of the new divisions are reassigned to a new area code. only,The impact of a split on the butgeneral thispublic stillinvolves requires the printing of new stationery, advertisements, and signage for many customers, and the dissemination of the new area code to family, friends, and customers. Computer systems, and telephone equipment may require updates in address books, speed dialing directories, and forother speedautomated dialingequipment.
 
Since area code splits have substantial impact in the involved communities, and involve substantial cost in telephone plant and exchange equipment, they are planned carefully well ahead of implementation with the intent that an area is not again affected by a subsequent realignment for at least a decade.<ref name="notes1975">AT&T, ''Notes on the Network'' (1975), Section 2</ref>
 
Furthermore, theThe new boundaries of the numbering plan areas are drawn in a manner that minimizes splitting communities and should coincide with political subdivision where practical.<ref name="notes1975" /> Other geographic features, such as rivers and bodies of water, mountain ranges, or highways may serve as guides for boundary placements. Tributary toll telephone routes should also not be unduly cut, so prevent rerouting to new toll center switching systems.
 
The area that retains the existing area code is typically the largest, or historically more established or developed place, but locations of large government bodies or other criteria may effect this decision.
 
==Area code overlays==
{{main|Overlay plancomplex}}
Not withstanding the desire for long-term stability of the local numbering plan and customer understanding, rapid growth in some areas has resulted in many splits within just a few years.
 
As a result, in the mid-early 1990s, the [[North American Numbering Plan Administrator]] Administrator(NANPA) introduced another method for exhaustion relief: the area code overlay. This method assigns multiple area codes to the same numbering plan area, so that existing subscribers can keep established telephone numbers. Only new accounts and extra lines receive telephone numbers with the new area code. This method requires [[ten-digit dialing]] for customers of both area codes, even for local calls. Since 2007, most territories use overlays for mitigating numbering shortages. Most area code relief plans today do not even consider splits as relief options, limiting options to overlay plans.<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://www.nationalnanpa.com/reports/2021_NANPA_Annual_Report.pdf |title=2021 NANPA Annual Report |last=North American Numbering Plan Administrator |date=March 2022}}</ref>
 
==See also==