Content deleted Content added
→Option 2: removed some BS |
Dispute, protection |
||
Line 663:
:Tamilnation.org is also a virtual library with sources from books, in some cases the full version of particular books are available on that site. Also, there are sources from various newspapers and media around the world on TamilNation. [[User:Wiki Raja|Wiki Raja]] 22:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
== Dispute, protection ==
I see that disputes over this have escalated to the point of article protection, which seems rather disproportionate to the subject. May I suggest that everybody cool off a bit and remember that the world will not be made or broken by Wikipedia's article on a classical dance form.
In general, in a controversial matter we should attempt to cite the differing views, attribute them appropriately, give them "column inches" roughly in proportion to their respective acceptance among scholars, and make sure that our narrative voice does not take a stance on the matter.
That said, it would probably be useful in moving matters forward if someone would attempt a '''neutral''' statement of what is currently in dispute, because the discussion above seems to me to shed more heat than light. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 07:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
|