Talk:Conversion between quaternions and Euler angles: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:51, 12 October 2023

Revision as of 16:24, 19 October 2023

Line 129:

:If you're interested, I showed how to get these equations on this open access paper: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276302. Moreover, apart from Scipy, I also implemented it on Sympy, which can be useful if you want to play with the equations symbolically. [[User:Ebernardes|Ebernardes]] ([[User talk:Ebernardes|talk]]) 06:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

::Just a heads-up though: the first definitions on this paper have sadly a mistake, and I still didn't manage to make the editors correct it... [[User:Ebernardes|Ebernardes]] ([[User talk:Ebernardes|talk]]) 06:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

:: @[[User:Ebernardes|Ebernardes]], thank you for all of the responses and links! This is helpful. For anyone wishing to have some Python code to use and test, here is my [https://github.com/ElectricRCAircraftGuy/eRCaGuy_hello_world/blob/master/python/quaternions_to_euler_angles.py quaternions_to_euler_angles.py] Python program from my [https://github.com/ElectricRCAircraftGuy/eRCaGuy_hello_world eRCaGuy_hello_world] repo. I test both techniques. See functions <code>quaternion2euler()</code> and <code>quaternion2euler2()</code>. I run unit tests on them both too.