Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Actualcpscm (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply |
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17:
*'''Keep'''. That the artcile was only recently created is of no importance, so a speedy close for that reason is out of the question. The AfD will run for 7 days, providing ample time to improve the article, if possible (which it is, see below). It might have been better to create it as a draft, but that's moot now. In any case, [https://miar.ub.edu/issn/0272-1716 MIAR reports] that this journal (not a magazine) is indexed in a number of important, selective databases (Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus, and MEDLINE), so this is a clear meet of [[WP:NJournals]]. --[[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 21:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
*:[[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] NJOURNALS is an essay, it doesn‘t have the broad consensus behind it that supports notability guidelines; the journal needs to meet GNG, and entries in selective databases are not GNG sources. [[User:Actualcpscm|Actualcpscm]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Actualcpscm|scrutinize]], [[User talk:Actualcpscm#top|talk]]</sup> 22:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' It's a kind of topic that I expect to find when I open an encyclopedia, it's distinct enough from related topics to warrant a page of its own, and we have the information to write about it. Nor is it a fringe journal; there is no risk of giving a pseudoscientific/crankish publication more respectability than it deserves. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 22:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||