Mixed-use development: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:05, 16 October 2023

Revision as of 16:07, 16 October 2023

Line 27:

Any of the above contexts may also include parallel contexts such as:

* ''[[Transit-oriented development]]''—for example in [[Los Angeles]] and [[San Diego]], where the cities made across-the-board zoning law changes permitting denser development within a certain distance of certain types of transit stations, with the primary aim of increasing the amount and affordability of housing<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2018/02/21/california-wants-cities-to-build-more-housing-near-transit-hubs-can-la-improve-its-track-record-on-tod/|last1=Schuetz|first1=Jenny|last2=Giuliano|first2=Genevieve|last3=Shin|first3=Eun Jin|title=California wants cities to build more housing near transit hubs. Can LA improve its track record on TOD?|publisher=Brookings Institution|date=February 21, 2018|access-date=September 20, 2019}}</ref>

* Older cities such as Chicago and San Francisco have ''[[historic preservation]]'' policies that sometimes offer more flexibility for older buildings to be used for purposes other than what they were originally zoned for, with the aim of preserving historic architecture<ref name="Laitos, Jan G. 2011, pp. 492">{{Cite journal|last1=Laitos|first1=Jan G.|last2=Abel|first2=Teresa H.|title=The Role of Brownfields as Sites for Mixed use Development Projects in America and Britain|journal=Denver Journal of International Law and Policy|volume=40|issue=1–3|date=2011|page=492}}</ref>

==Benefits==