Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: double negation, fix. |
→IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: note issue with my proposal. |
||
Line 93:
:Suffice it to say, we have enough here to write a start class article about this subject by summarizing secondary sources, augmented with verifiable information from primary sources, and without original research. If we're truly concerned this magazine is being promoted here, we could remove any non-independent primary sourced claims and still be left with an article. —[[User:Siroxo|siro]][[User talk:Siroxo|''χ'']][[Special:Contributions/Siroxo|o]] 03:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
*'''full merge'''. I've gone back-and-forth on this more than I have on nearly anything in a while. I don't think this meets the sourcing requirements of WP:N. The coverage is much closer to "in passing" than to "significant" IMO. That said, we do have a notion that some topics are more intrinsically notable than others (see WP:CORP for example) and our bar for inclusion should vary a bit because of that. To me, this is the type of thing we should be covering if the sources come close. And I'd push for this to be its own article ''if I felt that was the best way to present the information''. But I think a more-or-less full merge (maybe not the editors-in-chief list) of the article into [[List of IEEE publications]] is just as good as this article is very stubby and, given the dearth sources, really can't be more than that. Honestly I'm fine with a keep also, and I had an IAR keep argument written out but then changed my mind as I think we should stay inside of our guidelines and not use IAR unless doing so is clearly more helpful to the reader. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 19:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
**And yes, I know that involves reformatting, and probably splitting, that target. If folks feel that's not viable, I'm back to ''weak keep'' by IAR. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 19:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||