Revision as of 23:37, 28 October 2023 edit 62.83.41.23 (talk) From a grammatological perspective only the glyphs constitute writing, that is, personal and place names and dates. All other elements are iconography, art, not writing. The glyphs themselves are deciphered for the most part and follow a logosyllabic logic, just like Maya glyphs Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:51, 28 October 2023 edit undo 62.83.41.23 (talk) Deciphering Aztec Hieroglyphs Gordon Whittaker (2021). For all those who consider that writing can be pictographic (that is, without linguistic content) and those who say the Aztec script is pictographic. It's hieroglyphic, just like Maya writing. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit →
Line 19: ==Structure and use== Aztec was [[pictogram\|pictographic]] and [[ideographic]] [[proto-writing]], augmented by phonetic [[Rebus#Examples from history\|rebuses]]. It also contained syllabic signs and logograms. There was no alphabet, but puns also contributed to recording sounds of the Aztec language. While some scholars have understood the system not to be considered a complete writing system, this is disputed by others. The existence of logograms and syllabic signs is being documented and a phonetic aspect of the writing system has emerged,<ref name="Lacadena"/> even though many of the syllabic characters have been documented since at least 1888 by Nuttall.<ref name="Zender">{{cite web\|last=Zender\|first=Marc\|title=One Hundred and Fifty Years of Nahuatl Decipherment\|url=http://www.mesoweb.com/pari/journal/archive/PARI0804.pdf\|work=The PARI Journal}}</ref> There are conventional signs for syllables and logograms which act as word signs or for their rebus content.<ref name="Zender"/> Logosyllabic writing appears on both painted and carved artifacts, such as the [[Tizoc Stone]].<ref>{{cite book\|last=VanEssendelft\|first=Willem\|title=The word made stone: deciphering and mapping the glyphs of the Tizoc stone\|year=2011\|___location=Harvard Special Collection\|page=86\|url=http://dingofence.com/content/VanEssendelftALMThesis_v2_6.pdf\|access-date=2012-10-15\|archive-date=2021-02-26\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226215123/http://dingofence.com/content/VanEssendelftALMThesis_v2_6.pdf\|url-status=dead}}</ref> However, instances of phonetic characters often appear within a significant artistic and pictorial context. In native manuscripts, the sequence of historical events is indicated by a line of footprints leading from one place or scene to another. <ref>{{cite book\|last=VanEssendelft\|first=Willem\|title=The word made stone: deciphering and mapping the glyphs of the Tizoc stone\|year=2011\|___location=Harvard Special Collection\|page=86\|url=http://dingofence.com/content/VanEssendelftALMThesis_v2_6.pdf\|access-date=2012-10-15\|archive-date=2021-02-26\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226215123/http://dingofence.com/content/VanEssendelftALMThesis_v2_6.pdf\|url-status=dead}}</ref>nt artistic and pictorial context. In native manuscripts, the sequence of historical events is indicated by a line of footprints leading from one place or scene to another. The [[ideographic]] nature of the writing is apparent in abstract concepts, such as death, represented by a corpse wrapped for burial; night, drawn as a black sky and a closed eye; war, by a shield and a club; and speech, illustrated as a little scroll issuing from the mouth of the person who is talking. The concepts of motion and walking were indicated by a trail of footprints.<ref name="Bray, Warwick 1968 93-96">{{cite book \|author=Bray, Warwick \|year=1968 \|title=Everyday Life of The Aztecs \|url=https://archive.org/details/everydaylifeofaz00warw \|url-access=registration \|pages=[https://archive.org/details/everydaylifeofaz00warw/page/93 93]–96\|publisher=Dorset Press \|isbn=9780880291439 }}</ref>

Aztec script: Difference between revisions