Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Don't believe merge works in this instance |
|||
Line 97:
**::I suppose so. It has 4 very short paragraphs, including the lede, of anything that's not filler. IMO that's pretty stubby, but I could see how others could disagree. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 03:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
:::{{u|Hobit}}: I really can't see how merge would work in this instance? [[List of IEEE publications]] has hundreds of publications, with no text about any of them. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 22:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
::::Yeah, as I thought about it more I reached the conclusion it would be a major change and so maybe a keep is better. But I think a bare list, as we have now, is a bit useless. I'd think we could do something like a "list of episodes" thing and split magazines from journals. Still a long list, but not a crazy one. Include years active, how often it's published and some details about each one (say under 500 words). Given that is such a huge change, I do think that a keep is probably the right answer for now. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 23:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||