Directive Principles: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
top: Fixed typo
Tags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
Line 154:
}}</ref> India has also been in favour of nuclear disarmament.<ref name="pgA45"/>
 
Per [[s:Constitution of India/Part IV|Article 38 (1)]], [[Justice delayed is justice denied|prompt rendering of the justice]] by courts is part of animating judiciary.<ref>{{cite web|title=Rule of law index, 2016|url=http://data.worldjusticeproject.org/|access-date=3 June 2017|archive-date=29 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429071718/http://data.worldjusticeproject.org/|url-status=dead}}</ref> Rendering prompt justice is the foremost purpose of the constitution as enshrined in the [[Preamble to the Constitution of India|Preamble to the constitution]] also.<ref name= animated/> However the judiciary is failing dismally in this respect by causing inordinate delay considering time of rendering justice in a case arbitrarily is its constitutional liberty.<ref>{{cite web|title=What causes judicial delay? Judgements diluting time frames in Code of Civil Procedure worsen the problem of adjournments|date=25 August 2016|url=http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/what-causes-judicial-delay-judgments-diluting-timeframes-in-code-of-civil-procedure-worsen-the-problem-of-adjournments/|access-date=13 September 2017}}</ref>
 
== Amendments ==