Revision as of 23:22, 5 April 2005 edit Jmabel (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 90,522 edits consistency		Revision as of 23:34, 5 April 2005 edit undo RickK (talk \| contribs) 36,836 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1: ==Re: recent move== As far as I know, we do not usually put honorific job titles such as "Cardinal" in the titles of articles. We don't even do this for monarchs. I realize it is a common way of referring to him (but "Queen Elizabeth II of England" is common—so to speak—, too). Ultimately I don't care a lot about this in any respect other than consistency. -- [[User:Jmabel\|Jmabel]] \| [[User talk:Jmabel\|Talk]] 23:22, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC) It seems to be the standard for Cardinals to do it this way. [[John Cardinal O'Connor]]. [[User:RickK\|Rick]][[User talk:RickK\|K]] 23:34, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Felix von Hartmann: Difference between revisions