Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coshc function: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Coshc function: Reply |
→Coshc function: rd |
||
Line 23:
*:That's hilarious! I wonder if any of the sources referenced on the [[Circular definition]] page reference the Wikipedia article in turn. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 18:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
*:Regarding the MathWorld business, I've been [[User:XOR'easter/So,_you've_decided_to_write_about_physics_and/or_mathematics_on_Wikipedia#Websites,_social_media,_and_discussion_groups|keeping a list]] of examples where that site has been a shoddy source, particularly for names. I don't think they have very high standards; sometimes it seems that if one person said it one time, MathWorld will accept it as a term. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 20:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
*'''Redirect all'''. Redirects are cheap, but agree that there's little sign of separate notability for these. [[User:Russ Woodroofe|Russ Woodroofe]] ([[User talk:Russ Woodroofe|talk]]) 10:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
|