Content deleted Content added
m clean up spacing around commas and other punctuation fixes, replaced: ,D → , D, ,N → , N |
|||
Line 21:
In the pre-automotive era of cities, traces of the concept of a hierarchy of streets in a network appear in Greek and subsequent Roman town plans. The main feature of their classification is their size. In Roman cities, such as [[Pompeii]], major thoroughfares (e.g. the [[Decumanus Maximus|decumanus]]) had a width of 12.2 m, secondary streets (e.g. the [[cardo]]) 6 m and tertiary streets (e.g. vicinae) measured 4.5 meters. The first allowed for two way cart traffic, the second generally only one, while the third only loaded animals. Narrower streets that could only accommodate pedestrians were also present in both Greek and Roman cities. Thus the restriction on connections between major streets on particular modes (carts and chariots) was the effect of the width of the street itself and not the lack of linkage. This method is akin to the contemporary concept of [[permeability (spatial and transport planning)|filtered permeability]].
A clearer record of a stricter hierarchical order of streets appears in surviving and functioning Arabic-Islamic cities that originate in the late first millennium AD such as the [[Medina of Tunis]], [[Marrakesh]], [[Fes el Bali|Fez]], and [[Damascus]].
In the automotive 20th century, the street hierarchy concept was first elaborated by [[Ludwig Hilberseimer]], in his ''City Plan'' of 1927. His major priorities were increasing the safety of [[primary school]]-age children [[walk to school campaign|walking to school]], and increasing the speed of traffic.
|