Talk:Object–relational mapping: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
s
removed nonsense ssssss from the end / proper formatting of critique section
Line 48:
== Links ==
 
There are far too many links. Please limit to only authoritative and well-organized sources. --[[User:Froggienation|Froggienation]] 20:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
== sCritique ==
 
== Critique ==--[[User:Froggienation|Froggienation]] 20:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 
It appears that the critique is violating NPOV, and seems very much like a personal opinion. It states as fact that ORM is a non-problem, and fails to explain or cite the fundamentals of data management, or explain why they are considered to stand in opposition to ORM. No citation is provided for the failure of Object Databases.
Line 73 ⟶ 72:
 
I removed the first paragraph as soon as I read it, it's so obviously biased and specifically bases it's primary point on JDBC, which is Java specific when the article not language specific. I left the second paragraph intact since it wasn't an outright rant like the first paragraph. --[[User:mikealrogers|mikeal]]
 
== s ==
 
sssssssssssss