Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Eastmain - 17674 |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Misc citation tidying. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by LeapTorchGear | #UCB_webform 230/339 |
||
Line 79:
}}</ref> states that "a W3C-led standardization of a 'free' codec, or the active endorsement of proprietary technology such as Ogg [...] by W3C, is, in our opinion, not helpful". [[Xiph.org]]'s codecs, while licensed under a [[BSD licenses#BSD-style licenses|BSD-style]] [[permissive free software license]], implement a standard controlled by Xiph.org themselves, rather than a multi-vendor community such as MPEG. [[Apple Inc.]], a member of the [[MPEG LA]], has also opposed the inclusion of Ogg formats in the HTML standard on the grounds that [[H.264]] performs better and is already more widely supported, citing patents on their codec's efficiency and the lack of precedents of "Placing requirements on format support", even at the "SHOULD" level, in HTML specifications.<ref name="apple-ogg">{{cite mailing list
|url=http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-March/010392.html
|title=[whatwg]
|date=21 March 2007
|access-date=2008-02-25
| |||