Content deleted Content added
m →Criticism: replaced "problematic" (academic jargon/cliché) with simply: "a problem" |
m →Applications of principled negotiation: Cross-Cultural-Applications of principled negotiations |
||
Line 83:
In [[social work]], principled negotiation can be used to advocate for a client's interests.<ref name="Lens2004">{{cite journal | last1 = Lens | first1 = Vicki | title = Principled Negotiation: A New Tool for Case Advocacy | journal = Social Work | date = July 2004 | volume = 49 | issue = 3 | pages = 506–513 | doi = 10.1093/sw/49.3.506 | url = }}</ref> For example, a social worker may need to negotiate with a government [[social services]] agency to obtain services for a client.<ref name="Lens2004"/>{{rp|508–511}} In the field of [[psychology]], principled negotiation has formed the basis for educational exercises about [[critical thinking]].<ref name="Bernstein1995">{{cite journal | last1 = Bernstein | first1 = David A. | title = A Negotiation Model for Teaching Critical Thinking | journal = Teaching of Psychology | date = February 1995 | volume = 22 | issue = 1 | pages = 22–24 | doi = 10.1207/s15328023top2201_7 | pmid = | url = }}</ref>
=== Cross-Cultural-Applications ===
A 2008 review of literature concluded that the book's ideas could be applied to [[cross-cultural]] negotiations "if interests are defined to include cultural interests".<ref name="Barkai2008">{{cite journal | last1 = Provis | first1 = Chris | title = Cultural Dimension Interests, the Dance of Negotiation, and Weather Forecasting: A Perspective on Cross-Cultural Negotiation | journal = Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal | date = April 2008 | volume = 8 | issue = 3 | pages = 403–448 | url = https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=drlj}}</ref> For example, when negotiating with people in China, a negotiator should be aware of the [[Thirty-Six Stratagems]] which may be employed.<ref name="Barkai2008" />{{rp|436–444}}
A 2020 literature review found significant differences in negotiation styles across various cultures, suggesting that negotiators must adapt their strategies based on cultural contexts<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schoen |first=Raphael |date=2021-04-01 |title=Lacking pluralism? A critical review of the use of cultural dimensions in negotiation research |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00187-5 |journal=Management Review Quarterly |language=en |volume=71 |issue=2 |pages=393–432 |doi=10.1007/s11301-020-00187-5 |issn=2198-1639}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Schoen |first=Raphael |date=2020-4-26 |title=Lacking pluralism? A critical review of the use of cultural dimensions in negotiation research |url=https://www.schoen-negotiation.com/en-gb/outreach |url-status=live |access-date=2024-05-07 |website=Schoen-Negotiation}}</ref>. Additionally, a 2022 literature review found that the successful application of most principled negotiation techniques is often hindered by the predominantly Western perspective through which these techniques were conceptualized<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schoen |first=Raphael |date=2021-01-01 |title=Getting to Yes in the cross-cultural-context: ‘one size doesn’t fit all’ – a critical review of principled negotiations across borders |url=https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-12-2020-0216 |journal=International Journal of Conflict Management |volume=33 |issue=1 |pages=22–46 |doi=10.1108/IJCMA-12-2020-0216 |issn=1044-4068}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Schoen |first=Raphael |date=2022-01-11 |title=Getting to Yes in the cross-cultural-context: ‘one size doesn’t fit all’ – a critical review of principled negotiations across borders |url=https://www.schoen-negotiation.com/en-gb/outreach}}</ref>.
===Criticism===
| |||