Argumentum ad populum: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
rv to Thijs!bot, since the argument is an appeal to experts, not the general public, this is not a clear example of Argumentum ad populum
Line 5:
==Examples==
This fallacy is sometimes committed while trying to convince a person that a widely popular theory is true.
*Since there is [[scientific consensus]] on theory A, then theory A must be true.
*Since 88% of the people polled believed in UFOs, they must exist.
*Since citizens have to pay taxes and are ruled by governments, the state must be a judicial reasoned and rightful institution.