Content deleted Content added
just another name for the procedure Tags: Reverted nowiki added Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Undid revision 1221572463 by 109.245.36.152 (talk) this is trolling |
||
Line 2:
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2018}}
[[File:Playing_cards_modified.jpg|thumb|A deck of face-down playing cards]]
'''Edge sorting
Applied by poker player [[Phil Ivey]] and subsequently challenged in court by the casino in which he did so, the England and Wales [[High Court of Justice|High Court]] and Court of Appeal and the UK Supreme Court ruled that the technique, which requires the player to trick the dealer into rotating specific, high-value cards, is cheating in civil law, and that a casino was justified in refusing payment of winnings. This ruling would not be applicable if the player simply took advantage of an observed error or anomaly in the deck for which he was not responsible.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/10/26/what-is-edge-sorting-and-why-did-it-cost-a-poker-star-10-million-in-winnings/?noredirect=on |title=What is 'edge-sorting' and why did it cost a poker star $10 million in winnings? |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |author=Derek Hawkins |date=26 October 2017 |accessdate=25 July 2018}}</ref>
|