Revision as of 12:46, 29 May 2024 edit IntGrah (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 935 edits →Agorithm > Pt. 4 (marking a visited) > claim of 'final and minimal': Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:47, 29 May 2024 edit undo IntGrah (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 935 edits Typo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 20: The section currently titled 'description' reads more like a [[Wikipedia:NOTHOW\|tutorial]] on how to run Dijkstra by hand. It's full of [[WP:YOU\|second person]] and even tells you to use a pencil and follow along. Aside from that, it's just a complete restatement of the 'Algorithm' section, except in the context of city roads, jargon removed. It is of course necessary to provide an explanation that can be understood by the general reader, but this is redundant and not the way to do it. [[User:IntGrah\|IntGrah]] ([[User talk:IntGrah\|talk]]) 22:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC) == ~~Agorithm~~Algorithm > Pt. 4 (marking a visited) > claim of 'final and minimal' == ''Context: Responding to @[[User:IntGrah\|IntGrah]]'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dijkstra%27s_algorithm&oldid=1226218209 edit]'s request to clarify why I feel that point 4 should refer reader to an aspect of point 5.''

Talk:Dijkstra's algorithm: Difference between revisions