Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Sneed: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
c
Line 15:
*'''Comment''' As a prominent columnist in the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' (circulation 368,062), I'd say Michael Sneed would have warranted an article ''without'' the recent hubbub. However, it might be best to start with a fresh slate. [[User:Zagalejo|Zagalejo]] 03:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' This article deserves its place in this free encyclopedia. Even if we have an article for every bad journalist, so what - if the servers cannot handle the traffic, wikipedia should not be in this business and does not deserve a place on the internet. The news business is a serious business, and people deserve to know who's creating false news just to gain publicity.
*'''Keep'''. If this event is not notable, I don't know what notable is. The false claim by this journalist has been cited all around the world and by all the networks, and it happened with the VT massacre. It definitely deserves its place in wikipedia.