Revision as of 15:39, 31 August 2024 edit Mathnerd314159 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,251 edits →Should we separate compiled/interpreted languages from the other early ones?: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:15, 9 September 2024 edit undo Herostratus (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 54,112 edits →Should we separate compiled/interpreted languages from the other early ones?: hmmm Next edit →
Line 173: :There is nothing stopping one from writing an interpreter and a compiler for the same language. At that point, the language is both interpreted and compiled - what is your proposal? :Regarding assembly, the translation from mnemonics to machine code is clearly a compilation step. [[User:Mathnerd314159\|Mathnerd314159]] ([[User talk:Mathnerd314159\|talk]]) 15:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC) ::Hmmm... so would the Jaquard loom cards be an Interpreted language? [[User:Herostratus\|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus\|talk]]) 23:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of programming languages: Difference between revisions