Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:WikiProject banner) (bot |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:WikiProject banner) (bot |
||
Line 159:
:::: {{u|Gonnym}}, thank you for your comment I did notice that the module had params like {{para|tf''N''}} for handling task forces, and I wondered how to proceed with that, given that the parent WikiProject didn't have its own banner, so I did the best I could. What I'm hearing, is, maybe this is too rare a case to be worth writing up as a troubleshooting case, and I accept that. But, what is the right path forward, here? Should Intertranswiki have its own banner, and then */OKA would use the {{para|tf''N''}} params? Or, is it good enough, the way things are, now? [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 11:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::I think that if there are not going to be any other task forces needing one, then don't bother changing it as it's already working. If another task force will need one then yes, they should be combined into one template. [[User:Gonnym|Gonnym]] ([[User talk:Gonnym|talk]]) 11:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
== Dark mode support ==
I implemented dark mode support for the banners in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Module%3AWikiProject_banner%2Fstyles.css%2Fsandbox&diff=1232655113&oldid=1230629451 these sandbox edits], without those on dark mode the banners are showing white text on light yellow background which is not great. The [[Module talk:WikiProject banner/testcases|test cases]] seem good to me, but I would still appreciate a second set of eyes on the change before deploying it. [[User:Taavi|Taavi]] ([[User talk:Taavi|talk!]]) 22:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
:Also {{done}} for the non-sandbox version. [[User:Taavi|Taavi]] ([[User talk:Taavi|talk!]]) 11:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks. Maybe coordinate with [[User:Jdlrobson]] as he was working on this also — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 02:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||