Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Database Project: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
close discussion: delete |
|||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below[[Template:Vfd top|.]] '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br >The result of the debate was '''delete'''. – [[User:ABCD|AB]][[User talk:ABCD|'''''CD''''']] 19:46, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
===[[Marvel Database Project]]===
Was nominated as a speedy, but I think it's worthy of a Vfd process. Personally, while I'm not interested in the contents, I think a non-commercial website and a wiki deserves more consideration than being deleted as an advert. '''No vote'''.-[[User:Gadfium|gadfium]] 06:12, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Line 6 ⟶ 8:
*'''Delete'''. I was that one that originally tagged this with speedy deletion. The website this article refers to is fairly new, has no notability, and shouldn't be confused with well-established sites such as marveldirectory.com. It came to my attention when the creator spammed his website to about 60 comicbook articles. The website it refers to looks impressive, but is an empty shell devoid of content. --[[User:NormanEinstein|NormanEinstein]] 16:13, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', marvelcruft. [[User:ComCat|ComCat]] 06:35, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''[[Template:Vfd bottom|.]]'' </div >
|