Revision as of 04:57, 16 October 2024 edit Mathglot (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 92,612 edits →Chatbots as valid sources or identifiers of them: Clarify. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:00, 16 October 2024 edit undo Awesome Aasim (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 23,194 edits →Chatbots as valid sources or identifiers of them: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 58: {{u\|Awesome Aasim}}, Can you please elaborate on your intentions with [[Special:Diff/1251335553\|this sandbox edit]] ? I believe that it would be a perversion of this module and the associated template to admit any notion of AI bots into the module configuration either as 1) a reliable source, or as 2) a good way to find reliable sources (their hallucinations are legion). Hence, I would be against porting your changes to the module or to the template without consensus achieved at an Rfc on this page advertised at the main venues where AI bots are being discussed, as well as at [[WP:VPR]]. Thanks, [[User:Mathglot\|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot\|talk]]) 04:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC) :I kind of agree as well. However, Google and Bing also index unreliable sources. I was initially going to put in a query "find reliable sources for $1" but then decided against it for some reason. [[User:Awesome Aasim\|Awesome]] [[User_talk:Awesome Aasim\|Aasim]] 14:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Module talk:Find sources: Difference between revisions