Revision as of 16:53, 16 October 2024 edit Pppery (talk \| contribs) Interface administrators, Administrators 117,077 edits →Chatbots as valid sources or identifiers of them: Re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:25, 16 October 2024 edit undo Awesome Aasim (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 23,194 edits →Chatbots as valid sources or identifiers of them: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 66: <small>'''Listed at:''' [[Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)]]. [[User:Mathglot\|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot\|talk]]) 16:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)</small> :I think that even if chatbots were 100% accurate in their output, we would still want to avoid using them for use-cases like this because of how heavily these technologies rely on Wikipedia itself as an information source. We need to stay upstream of LLMs to avoid circular referencing. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill\|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill\|''talk'']]</sup> 16:47, 16 October 2024 (UTC) ::I wonder if with the right prompt engineering we can get these chatbots to actually spit out reliable sources. We can maybe base our entire prompt based on something like [[WP:RSPS]]. Although it probably would overfill the query parameter. [[User:Awesome Aasim\|Awesome]] [[User_talk:Awesome Aasim\|Aasim]] 17:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Module talk:Find sources: Difference between revisions