Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Guide: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Chaotic Enby (talk | contribs) →Spotting AI: rewording |
|||
Line 7:
==Spotting AI==
{{further reading|Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/AI Catchphrases}}
Identifying AI-assisted edits is difficult in most cases since the generated text is often indistinguishable from human text. Some exceptions are if the text contains phrases like "as an AI model" or "as of my last knowledge update" and if the editor copy-pasted the [[Prompt engineering|prompt]] used to generate the text together with the AI response. Other indications include the presence obvious [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|AI hallucinations]].
* AI content sometimes takes a promotional tone, reading like a tourism website.
Line 14 ⟶ 15:
** Example: the article [[Special:Permalink/1188376670|Leninist historiography]] was entirely written by AI and previously included a [https://web.archive.org/web/20230927000223/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leninist_historiography list of completely fake sources] in Russian and Hungarian at the bottom of the page. Google turned up no results for these sources.
** Other example: the article ''[[Estola albosignata]]'', about a beetle species, had [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Estola_albosignata&diff=prev&oldid=1152503574 paragraphs written by AI] sourced to actual German and French sources. While the sourced articles were real, they were completely off-topic, with the French one discussing an unrelated genus of crabs.
* AI usually capitalizes every word in section
* Automatic AI detectors like [[GPTZero]] are unreliable and should only ever be used with caution. Given the high rate of false positives, deleting or tagging content purely because it was flagged by an automatic AI detector is not acceptable.
| |||