Content deleted Content added
→Primary visual cortex (V1): removed a wrong citation Tags: references removed Visual edit |
→Function: removed an obscure citation, added a relevant one, and other small corrections |
||
Line 85:
The tuning properties of V1 neurons (what the neurons respond to) differ greatly over time. Early in time (40 ms and further) individual V1 neurons have strong tuning to a small set of stimuli. That is, the neuronal responses can discriminate small changes in visual [[Orientation (mental)|orientations]], [[spatial frequencies]] and [[color]]s (as in the optical system of a [[camera obscura]], but projected onto [[retina]]l cells of the eye, which are clustered in density and fineness).<ref name= kepler1604 /> Each V1 neuron propagates a signal from a retinal cell, in continuation. Furthermore, individual V1 neurons in humans and other animals with [[binocular vision]] have ocular dominance, namely tuning to one of the two eyes. In V1, and primary sensory cortex in general, neurons with similar tuning properties tend to cluster together as [[cortical column]]s. [[David Hubel]] and [[Torsten Wiesel]] proposed the classic ice-cube organization model of cortical columns for two tuning properties: [[ocular dominance columns|ocular dominance]] and orientation. However, this model cannot accommodate the color, spatial frequency and many other features to which neurons are tuned {{Citation needed|date=November 2011}}. The exact organization of all these cortical columns within V1 remains a hot topic of current research. The mathematical modeling of this function has been compared to [[Gabor transform]]s.{{Citation needed|date=May 2023}}
Later in time (after 100 ms), neurons in V1 are also sensitive to the more global organisation of the scene
The visual information relayed
A theoretical explanation of the computational function of the simple cells in the primary visual cortex has been presented in.<ref name=Lin13BICY>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lindeberg T | title = A computational theory of visual receptive fields | journal = Biological Cybernetics | volume = 107 | issue = 6 | pages = 589–635 | date = December 2013 | pmid = 24197240 | pmc = 3840297 | doi = 10.1007/s00422-013-0569-z }}</ref><ref name=Lin21Heliyon>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lindeberg T | title = Normative theory of visual receptive fields | journal = Heliyon | volume = 7 | issue = 1 | pages = e05897 | date = January 2021 | pmid = 33521348 | pmc = 7820928 | doi = 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05897 | doi-access = free | bibcode = 2021Heliy...705897L }}</ref><ref name=Lin23Front>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lindeberg T | title = Covariance properties under natural image transformations for the generalised Gaussian derivative model for visual receptive fields | journal = Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience | volume = 17 | pages = 1189949 | date = 2023 | pmid = 37398936 | pmc = 10311448 | doi = 10.3389/fncom.2023.1189949 | doi-access = free }}</ref> It is described how receptive field shapes similar to those found by the biological receptive field measurements performed by DeAngelis et al.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD | title = Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways | journal = Trends in Neurosciences | volume = 18 | issue = 10 | pages = 451–458 | date = October 1995 | pmid = 8545912 | doi = 10.1016/0166-2236(95)94496-r | s2cid = 12827601 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |chapter-url=https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/5395/chapter/3948206/A-Modern-View-ofthe-Classical-Receptive-Field |chapter=A Modern View of the Classical Receptive Field: Linear and Nonlinear Spatiotemporal Processing by V1 Neurons |vauthors=DeAngelis GC, Anzai A |title=The Visual Neurosciences, 2-vol. Set |date=2003-11-21 |publisher=The MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-27012-0 |veditors=Chalupa LM, Werner JS |volume=1 |___location=Cambridge |pages=704–719 |language=en |doi=10.7551/mitpress/7131.003.0052 }}</ref> can be derived as a consequence of structural properties of the environment in combination with internal consistency requirements to guarantee consistent image representations over multiple spatial and temporal scales. It is also described how the characteristic receptive field shapes, tuned to different scales, orientations and directions in image space, allow the visual system to compute invariant responses under natural image transformations at higher levels in the visual hierarchy.<ref name=Lin13PONE>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lindeberg T | title = Invariance of visual operations at the level of receptive fields | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 8 | issue = 7 | pages = e66990 | year = 2013 | pmid = 23894283 | pmc = 3716821 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0066990 | doi-access = free | arxiv = 1210.0754 | bibcode = 2013PLoSO...866990L }}</ref><ref name=Lin21Heliyon/><ref name=Lin23Front/>
|