Brouwer fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 168:
For ''n'' > 2, however, proving the impossibility of the retraction is more difficult. One way is to make use of [[Homology (mathematics)|homology groups]]: the homology ''H''<sub>''n''−1</sub>(''D''<sup>''n''</sup>) is trivial, while ''H''<sub>''n''−1</sub>(''S''<sup>''n''−1</sup>) is infinite [[cyclic group|cyclic]]. This shows that the retraction is impossible, because again the retraction would induce an injective group homomorphism from the latter to the former group.
 
The impossibility of a retraction can also be shown using the [[de Rham cohomology]] of open subsets of Euclidean space ''E''<sup>''n''</sup>. For ''n'' ≥ 2, the de Rham cohomology of ''U'' = ''E''<sup>''n''</sup> – (0) is one-dimensional in degree 0 and ''n'' - 1, and vanishes otherwise. If a retraction existed, then ''U'' would have to be contractible and its de Rham cohomology in degree ''n'' - 1 would have to vanish, a contradiction.<ref>{{harvnb|Madsen|Tornehave |1997|pages=39–48}}</ref>
 
===A proof using Stokes' theorem===