Content deleted Content added
Richard Yin (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by Vaishnavi 7667 (talk): rv incorrect grammar (AV) |
Asilvering (talk | contribs) m Removing link(s) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where (SQL) closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
Line 12:
* <code>[[Alias (SQL)|AS]]</code> optionally provides an alias for each column or expression in the <code>SELECT</code> list. This is the relational algebra [[Rename_(relational_algebra)|rename]] operation.
* <code>[[From (SQL)|FROM]]</code> specifies from which table to get the data.<ref>Omitting FROM clause is not standard, but allowed by most major DBMSes.</ref>
* <code>
* <code>[[Group by (SQL)|GROUP BY]]</code> groups rows sharing a property so that an [[aggregate function]] can be applied to each group.
* <code>[[Having (SQL)|HAVING]]</code> selects among the groups defined by the GROUP BY clause.
Line 26:
* The <code>[[From (SQL)|FROM]]</code> clause, which indicates the tables to retrieve data from. The <code>FROM</code> clause can include optional <code>[[Join (SQL)|JOIN]]</code> subclauses to specify the rules for joining tables.
* The <code>
* The <code>GROUP BY</code> clause projects rows having common values into a smaller set of rows. <code>GROUP BY</code> is often used in conjunction with SQL aggregation functions or to eliminate duplicate rows from a result set. The <code>WHERE</code> clause is applied before the <code>GROUP BY</code> clause.
* The <code>[[Having (SQL)|HAVING]]</code> clause includes a predicate used to filter rows resulting from the <code>GROUP BY</code> clause. Because it acts on the results of the <code>GROUP BY</code> clause, aggregation functions can be used in the <code>HAVING</code> clause predicate.
|