Computer user satisfaction: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:47, 7 January 2025

Revision as of 03:12, 7 January 2025

Line 24:

==The problem of defining ''user satisfaction''==

As none of the [[instruments]] in common use really rigorously define their construct of user satisfaction, some scholars such as Cheyney, Mann and Amoroso (1986) have called for more research on the factors which influence the success of end-user computing. Little subsequent effort which sheds new light on the matter exists, however. All factor-based instruments run the risk of including factors irrelevant to the respondent, while omitting some that may be highly significant to him/herthem. Needless to say, this is further exacerbated by the ongoing changes in [[information technology]].

In the literature there are two definitions for user satisfaction, 'User satisfaction' and 'User Information Satisfaction' are used interchangeably. According to Doll and Torkzadeh (1988), 'user satisfaction' is defined as the opinion of the user about a specific [[computer application]] that they use. Ives et al. (1983) defined 'User Information Satisfaction' as "the extent to which users believe the information system available to them meets their information requirements." Other terms for User Information Satisfaction are "system acceptance" (Igersheim, 1976), "perceived usefulness" (Larcker and Lessig, 1980), "MIS appreciation" (Swanson, 1974) and "feelings about information system" (Maish, 1979). Ang and Koh (1997) have described user information satisfaction (UIS) as "a perceptual or subjective measure of system success." This means that user information satisfaction will differ in meaning and significance from person to person. In other words, users who are equally satisfied with the same system according to one definition and measure may not be similarly satisfied according to another.