Content deleted Content added
Remove topic that ended up just being a conversation with myself... |
→Undialects in infobox: Reply |
||
Line 242:
* T, is a Scheme '''implementation'''.
[[User:Rursus|Rursus]] dixit. ([[User talk:Rursus|<span style="color: red; background: #FFFF80"><sup>m</sup><u>bork<sup>3</sup></u></span>]]!) 11:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
:I added some clarification about this in the "Genealogy and variants" section. I left the infobox alone because it's not clear I could add clarity here. The problem is that there isn't always a distinction between a dialect and an implementation (for example, both Clojure and Emacs Lisp are just implementations without a corresponding standard). I think it would increase confusion to try to arbitrarily decide whether these ones should go in a "dialect" or "implementation" section. [[User:Skyvine|skyvine ]] ([[User talk:Skyvine|talk]]) 19:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
== If Then Else ==
| |||