Revision as of 11:27, 23 January 2025 edit Ligaturama (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions 3,488 edits WP:NOTHOWTO; reads like a textbook, generally isn't about the article topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:30, 23 January 2025 edit undo Ligaturama (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions 3,488 edits →Portability: Cited sources do not use the word "lambdalith" Next edit →
Line 31: ==Portability== Migration from AWS Lambda to other AWS compute services, such as Amazon ECS, presents challenges due to tight integration with AWS Lambda's APIs, often referred to as service lock-in.{{whom\|date=January 2025}} Tools like AWS Lambda Web Adapter offer a pathway for [[Software portability\|portability]] by enabling developers to build web applications using familiar frameworks under ~~the "Lambdalith" or~~a monolithic Lambda design pattern. <ref>{{Cite web \|title=AWS Lambda Web Adapter \|website=[[GitHub]] \|url=https://github.com/awslabs/aws-lambda-web-adapter \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241128211006/https://github.com/awslabs/aws-lambda-web-adapter \|archive-date=2024-11-28 \|access-date=2024-11-29}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=The Lambda monolith \|url=https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/monolith.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241126020340/https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/monolith.html \|archive-date=2024-11-26 \|access-date=2024-11-29}}</ref> However, this approach introduces limitations, including coarser-grained alerting and access controls, potential cold start delays with large dependencies, and limited suitability for non-HTTP APIs.{{whom\|date=January 2025}} == Security ==

AWS Lambda: Difference between revisions