Content deleted Content added
→Big ole whitelist request: this whitelist doesn't affect {{Harvc}}. I would just set ignore_err=yes for now. |
→Big ole whitelist request: Reply to User:hike395 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply |
||
Line 62:
:::You've done nothing wrong: there's some other problem. I'm investigating. (Camping on the Sierra side of US395 can be delightful, also; some people like the solitude of the Great Basin, though). — [[User:Hike395|hike395]] ([[User talk:Hike395|talk]]) 16:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Folly Mox}} The problem is in [[Module:Harvc]]. It doesn't use the whitelist/wrapper mechanism in this module. For now, I would set {{para|ignore_err|yes}} in {{tl|Harvc}} to suppress the spurious errors. I'll think about whether we can use the mechanism here over there. — [[User:Hike395|hike395]] ([[User talk:Hike395|talk]]) 18:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::Huh! Ok, thank you so much for identifying the issue! Using {{tl|harvc}} was a pretty big reason I wanted to whitelist the ''[[Cambridge History of China]]'' CITEREFs above (duplicating all that bibliographic information for each chapter is pretty bloaty), and I feel like it used to work?{{pb}}Anyway, thanks again and I'll just hide the errors, like when the building inspector comes round. [[User:Folly Mox|Folly Mox]] ([[User talk:Folly Mox|talk]]) 19:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
== Making whitelisting simpler and more efficient ==
| |||