Revision as of 22:12, 15 February 2025 edit Blueboar (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 53,901 edits →' Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source': Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:18, 15 February 2025 edit undo Traumnovelle (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,804 edits →' Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source': Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 237: ::::::::I won't reference specific disputes, but every time I have seen it used it is to justify inclusion of content I would characterise as either UNDUE or OR. [[User:Traumnovelle\|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle\|talk]]) 21:37, 15 February 2025 (UTC) :::::::::If someone is incorrectly pointing to this essay to justify adding UNDUE or OR material, I doubt they have actually read the essay. This essay attempts to explain how and when to use various sources ''correctly''. [[User:Blueboar\|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar\|talk]]) 22:12, 15 February 2025 (UTC) ::::::::::You're correct, sorry this has been a bit of a waste of time. I don't have any actual suggestions on how to improve the wording of the section to avoid bad interpretations. [[User:Traumnovelle\|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle\|talk]]) 22:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Identifying and using primary sources: Difference between revisions