Content deleted Content added
Yeah, the claim of "pure OO" is meaningless |
added comment for the loop example |
||
Line 25:
:Yeah, the claim of "pure OO" is meaningless, as everyone has different ideas of what constitutes purity. Probably the fact all Eiffel types are classes (even INTEGER and NONE) contributed to this claim, but as you say, there are different dimensions of purity. --[[User:P3d0|P3d0]] 18:33, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
-----
The loop example is silly, it would be better to show an example using the COLLECTION interface or at least *even* an example of that, since you almost always use that interface wich ius available in every kind of sequence/list/array/data structure.
from
x.start
until
x.after
loop
x.forth
x.
end
| |||