Recovery model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:37, 22 March 2025

Revision as of 13:11, 29 March 2025

Line 88:

Some US states, such as [[California]] (see the [[California Mental Health Services Act]]), [[Wisconsin]] and [[Ohio]], already report redesigning their mental health systems to stress recovery model values like hope, healing, empowerment, social connectedness, human rights, and recovery-oriented services.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Jacobson N, Greenley D |title=What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication |journal= Psychiatric Services|volume=52 |issue=4 |pages=482–5 |date=April 2001 |pmid=11274493 |doi=10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.482|doi-access=free}}</ref>

At least some parts of the [[Canadian Mental Health Association]], such as the [[Ontario]] region, have adopted recovery as a guiding principle for reforming and developing the mental health system.<ref name="OntarioRecovery">Canadian{{cite Mental Health Association, Ontario (2003) [httpweb|url=https://www.ontariomindfulnesscontent.cmha.cacom/contentblog/reading_room/policy_positions.asp?cID=3739 Recovery rediscovered: Implications essential-resources-for the Ontario mental health system]{{dead link-personal-recovery-and-self-empowerment|datetitle=April 2017}}</ref>

Breaking Barriers: Essential Resources for Personal Recovery and Self-Empowerment

| website= mindfulnesscontent.com }}</ref>

===New Zealand and Australia===