Recovery model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
United States and Canada: a blogpost on a site about mindfulness is not the type of source that we are looking for :)
Line 88:
Some US states, such as [[California]] (see the [[California Mental Health Services Act]]), [[Wisconsin]] and [[Ohio]], already report redesigning their mental health systems to stress recovery model values like hope, healing, empowerment, social connectedness, human rights, and recovery-oriented services.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Jacobson N, Greenley D |title=What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication |journal= Psychiatric Services|volume=52 |issue=4 |pages=482–5 |date=April 2001 |pmid=11274493 |doi=10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.482|doi-access=free}}</ref>
 
At least some parts of the [[Canadian Mental Health Association]], such as the [[Ontario]] region, have adopted recovery as a guiding principle for reforming and developing the mental health system.<ref name="OntarioRecovery">{{cite web | title=MHCC releases recovery-oriented guidelines | website=CMHA Ontario | url=https://wwwontario.mindfulnesscontentcmha.comca/blognews/essentialmhcc-resources-for-personalreleases-recovery-andoriented-self-empowermentguidelines/?utm |title= access-date=2025-04-06}}</ref>
Breaking Barriers: Essential Resources for Personal Recovery and Self-Empowerment
| website= mindfulnesscontent.com }}</ref>
 
===New Zealand and Australia===