Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander George Arbuthnot: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:48, 6 May 2007

Revision as of 16:13, 6 May 2007

Line 22:

*'''Strong keep'''. Very notable incident during the Seminole War. International repercussions and had permanent effect on [[Andrew Jackson|General Jackson]]'s reputation. No replies required from my shadow trolls. - [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster ]]<small>[[User_talk:Kittybrewster| (talk)]]</small> 12:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

:*'''Comment''', "International repercussions and had permanent effect on General Jackson's reputation" - yes the incident caused this not the person. Is there any chance the you could start being a little more objective when it comes to articles that you have created about your own family - remember [[WP:COI]]--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] 13:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

::*'''Comment''': Clear demonstration, if it were needed, of the malice motivating these AfDs against anyone with the surname Arbuthnot. [[User:David Lauder|David Lauder]] 16:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

*'''Rename'''. This article is not really about Alexander George Arbuthnot it is more about the incident which seems notable but not the person.--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] 13:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

:*'''Repeat''': you've already said that above. [[User:David Lauder|David Lauder]] 16:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' per DGG and Kittybrewster. As noted, the article needs a good re-write to make historical importance clear in the introductory paragraph. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 14:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' as [[WP:ATT|unattributed]] with questionable notability. No opposition to a ''properly sourced & verifiable'' article about the ''incident'' itself. /[[User:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] 15:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)