Content deleted Content added
→RfC on redirect vs other options: new section |
|||
Line 89:
:::::I support a redirect. But until we have one, I disagree with the current statement that "cumulative density function" is sometimes used to mean "probability density function". I don't think anyone in this discussion believes that to be true? —[[User:St.nerol|St.Nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/St.nerol|contribs]]) 22:37, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::I also support a redirect. I'm not sure how to do this procedurally. I looked at the old discussion and I was not so convinced that it excluded the redirect. But it's clearly contentious to some extent. An AfD doesn't seem quite right because no one actually wants to delete the page. Maybe an RfC? {{u|St.nerol}} would you like to set that up? I don't want to fiddle with all the templates at this exact moment, though I think there are fewer of them than for an AfD. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 17:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
== RfC on redirect vs other options ==
{{rfc|schi}
Should the page [[cumulative density function]] be:
* Option '''A''': a redirect to [[cumulative distribution function]]
* Option '''B''': a disambigg between that article and [[probability density function]]
* Option '''C''': an article with expository content, or
* Option '''D''': deleted (would probably require further process) --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 21:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
| |||