Content deleted Content added
review: rm rep. correct power statement. |
→DRAM: dram timeline was out of chronological order so i fixed it Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 805:
|{{?}}
|<ref name="hynix90s-skhynix.com"/>
|-▼
|{{sort|2001|June 2001}}▼
|TC51W3216XB▼
|32 Mbit▼
|PSRAM▼
|[[Toshiba]]▼
|{{?}}▼
|CMOS▼
|{{?}}▼
|<ref>{{cite news |title=Toshiba's new 32 Mb Pseudo-SRAM is no fake |url=https://www.theengineer.co.uk/toshibas-new-32-mb-pseudo-sram-is-no-fake/ |access-date=29 June 2019 |work=The Engineer |date=24 June 2001 |language=en-UK |archive-date=29 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190629232051/https://www.theengineer.co.uk/toshibas-new-32-mb-pseudo-sram-is-no-fake/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>▼
|-
|{{sort|2001|February 2001}}
|{{?}}
|4 Gbit
|DRAM
|Samsung
Line 826 ⟶ 815:
|{{?}}
|<ref name="stol"/><ref>{{cite web |title=A Study of the DRAM industry |url=https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/59138/659514510-MIT.pdf |publisher=[[MIT]] |date=8 June 2010 |access-date=29 June 2019}}</ref>
▲|-
▲|{{sort|2001|June 2001}}
▲|TC51W3216XB
▲|32 Mbit
▲|PSRAM
▲|[[Toshiba]]
▲|{{?}}
▲|CMOS
▲|{{?}}
▲|<ref>{{cite news |title=Toshiba's new 32 Mb Pseudo-SRAM is no fake |url=https://www.theengineer.co.uk/toshibas-new-32-mb-pseudo-sram-is-no-fake/ |access-date=29 June 2019 |work=The Engineer |date=24 June 2001 |language=en-UK |archive-date=29 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190629232051/https://www.theengineer.co.uk/toshibas-new-32-mb-pseudo-sram-is-no-fake/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
|}
| |||