Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTP payload formats: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Wcquidditch (talk | contribs) →RTP payload formats: Reply |
|||
Line 12:
::I agree with [[User:Pppery]] that this article is sort of a list, but disagree that this is inappropriate. The table that constitues the bulk of the article gives context and explanation, refuting the argument on directories and catalogs. Instead, it describes a notable subject: the fact that there exist plethora of RTP payloads. It serves as a stepping stone for further investigation and research for those with further interest.
::I also disagree with [[User:MarioGom]] that a redirect should suffice and with [[User:Wcquidditch]] that the existence is sufficiently described in the main article. The referenced section only briefly summarises the large number of different formats.— [[User:Dandorid|<i><sub><u>D</u></sub><sup><b>a</b></sup><small>n</small><sub><u>d</u></sub><sup><b>o</b></sup><small>r</small><sup><b>i</b></sup><sub><u>D</u></sub></i>]] ([[User Talk:Dandorid|talk]]) 06:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
::My only comment here (until now) has purely been deletion sorting; I have (and had) no opinion on the article. It is [[User:Anonrfjwhuikdzz|Anonrfjwhuikdzz]] that says that material at the main article — which I will note is [[Real-time Transport Protocol]] — is sufficient. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 10:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
| |||