Content deleted Content added
See removed category's page for explanation |
|||
Line 10:
| authority = [[von Koenigswald]], 1935<ref name=Koenigswald1935>{{cite journal|last1=von Koenigswald|first1=G. H. R.|title=Eine fossile Säugetierfauna mit Simia aus Südchina|journal=Proceedings of the Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam|date=1935|volume=38|issue=8|pages=874–879|url=http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/publications/PU00016780.pdf|access-date=12 December 2017|archive-date=12 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171212084230/http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/publications/PU00016780.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
}}
'''''Gigantopithecus''''' ({{IPAc-en|d|ʒ|aɪ|ˌ|g|æ|n|t|oʊ|p|ɪ|ˈ|θ|i|k|ə|s|,_|ˈ|p|ɪ|θ|ɪ|k|ə|s|,_|d|ʒ|ɪ|-}} {{respell|jy|gan|toh|pih|THEE|kəs|,_|-PITH|ih|kəs|,_|jih-}}<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dictionary.com/browse/gigantopithecus|title=Definition of gigantopithecus {{!}} Dictionary.com|website=dictionary.com|language=en|access-date=2 October 2022|archive-date=3 October 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221003015831/https://www.dictionary.com/browse/gigantopithecus|url-status=live}}</ref>){{efn|name=title|{{lit|giant ape}}; from [[Ancient Greek]] {{lang|grc|γίγας}} (
''Gigantopithecus'' has traditionally been restored as a massive, [[gorilla]]-like ape, potentially {{convert|200|-|300|kg|abbr=in}} when alive, but the paucity of remains make total size estimates highly speculative. The species may have been [[sexual dimorphism|sexually dimorphic]], with males much bigger than females. The incisors are reduced and the canines appear to have functioned like [[cheek teeth]] ([[premolar]]s and molars). The premolars are high-[[crown (tooth)|crowned]], and the fourth premolar is very molar-like. The molars are the largest of any known ape, and have a relatively flat surface. ''Gigantopithecus'' had the thickest [[tooth enamel|enamel]] by absolute measure of any ape, up to {{convert|6|mm|in|abbr=in|frac=4}} in some areas, though this is only fairly thick when tooth size is taken into account.
''Gigantopithecus'' appears to have been a [[generalist and specialist species|generalist]]
==Discovery==
Line 30:
In 1935, von Koenigswald considered ''Gigantopithecus'' to be closely allied with the [[Late Miocene]] ''[[Sivapithecus]]'' from India.<ref name=Koenigswald1935/> In 1939, South African palaeontologist [[Robert Broom]] hypothesised that it was closely allied with ''[[Australopithecus]]'' and the [[last common ancestor]] of humans and other apes.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Broom|first=R.|author-link=Robert Broom|year=1939|title=The dentition of the Transvaal Pleistocene anthropoids, ''Plesianthropus'' and ''Paranthropus''|journal=Annals of the Transvaal Museum|volume=19|issue=3|pages=303–314|url=https://journals.co.za/docserver/fulltext/nfi_annalstm/19/3/484.pdf?expires=1587575563&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=2AB75E7DD6F91D015A8D2145BD8137F9}}</ref> In 1946, Jewish German anthropologist [[Franz Weidenreich]] described ''Gigantopithecus'' as a human ancestor as "''Gigantanthropus''", believing that the human lineage went through a gigantic phase. He stated that the teeth are more similar to those of modern humans and ''[[Homo erectus]]'' (at the time "''Pithecanthropus''" for [[Java Man|early Javan specimens]]), and envisioned a lineage from ''Gigantopithecus'', to the Javan ape ''[[Meganthropus]]'' (then considered a human ancestor), to "''Pithecanthropus''", to "''[[Solo Man|Javanthropus]]''", and finally [[Aboriginal Australian]]s. This was part of his [[multiregional origin of modern humans|multiregional hypothesis]], that all modern races and ethnicities evolved independently from a local archaic human species, rather than sharing a more recent and fully modern common ancestor.<ref name=Weidenreich1946>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.531106|first=F.|last=Weidenreich|author-link=Franz Weidenreich|year=1946|title=Apes, Giants, and Man|publisher=University of Chicago Press|pages=[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.531106/page/n68 58]–66}}</ref> In 1952, von Koenigswald agreed that ''Gigantopithecus'' was a [[hominin]], but believed it was an offshoot rather than a human ancestor.<ref>{{cite journal|last=von Koenigswald|first=G. H. R.|author-link=Gustav Heinrich Ralph von Koenigswald|year=1952|title=''Gigantopithecus blacki'' von Koenigswald, a giant fossil hominoid from the Pleistocene of southern China|journal=Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History|volume=43|pages=292–325|hdl=2246/298}}</ref> Much debate followed whether ''Gigantopithecus'' was a hominin or not for the next three decades until the [[Out of Africa theory|Out of Africa]] hypothesis overturned the {{ill|Out of Asia|nl|Out of Asia-theorie}} and multiregional hypotheses, firmly placing humanity's origins in Africa.<ref name=ZhangHarrison2017/><ref name=Hartwig2002/>
''Gigantopithecus'' is now classified in the
In 2019, [[peptide sequencing]] of [[dentine]] and [[Tooth enamel|enamel]] proteins of a ''Gigantopithecus'' molar from [[Chuifeng Cave]] indicates that ''Gigantopithecus'' was indeed closely allied with orangutans, and, assuming the current [[mutation rate]] in orangutans has remained constant, shared a common ancestor about 12–10 million years ago in the [[Middle Miocene|Middle]] to Late Miocene. Their last common ancestor would have been a part of the Miocene [[Adaptive radiation|radiation]] of apes. The same study calculated a divergence time between the Ponginae and African [[great ape]]s about 26–17.7 million years ago.<ref name= "Welker2019">{{cite journal|last1= Welker|first1= F.|last2= Ramos-Madrigal|first2= J.|last3= Kuhlwilm|first3= M.|last4= Liao|first4= W.|last5= Gutenbrunner|first5= P.|last6=de Manuel|first6= M.|last7= Samodova|first7= D.|last8= Mackie|first8= M.|last9= Allentoft|first9=M. E.|last10= Bacon|first10= A.-M.|last11= Collins|first11=M. J.|last12= Cox|first12= J.|last13= Lalueza-Fox|first13 =C.|last14= Olsen|first14=J. V.|last15= Demeter|first15= F.|last16= Wang|first16= W.|last17= Marques-Bonet|first17= T.|last18= Cappellini|first18= E.|display-authors= 3|title= Enamel proteome shows that ''Gigantopithecus'' was an early diverging pongine|journal= Nature|year= 2019|doi= 10.1038/s41586-019-1728-8|pmc= 6908745|pmid= 31723270|volume= 576|issue= 7786|pages= 262–265|bibcode= 2019Natur.576..262W}}</ref>
|