Content deleted Content added
→LISP "Logo": Logo. |
→LISP "Logo": just say no |
||
Line 569:
My recommendation is that we put both, or more logos if there are any, with a note that there is no official logo, but several logos have come to represent Lisp. The unofficial logos all seem to 'represent' the language to a significant userbase. Doing a quick google search, the most common logo actually seems to be [https://www.redbubble.com/i/sticker/LISP-logo-by-hasselbackt/38219558.EJUG5 here]. [[User:Epachamo|Epachamo]] ([[User talk:Epachamo|talk]]) 04:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:Or, maybe don't. The Lisp described in this article is not a single language but rather a family of languages. Why does the article need a logo? Lisp is a family of computer programming languages, not a pop music act. [[User:Quale|Quale]] ([[User talk:Quale|talk]]) 06:11, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
|