Content deleted Content added
Line 75:
:No, I don't see a reason why that would be the ideal CITEVAR for this article. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">[[User:Remsense|<span style="color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]]<span style="color:#fff"> 🌈 </span>[[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="color:#fff">'''论'''</span>]]</span> 23:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
:I have no objections at all, and would prefer to have either all long or all short (either is fine), but not the random mix there is now. I am currently trying to untangle the THREE sources to the 1993 Ritchie paper, but stepped away for the moment because {{t|cite Q}} is annoying me. I was also thinking the {{t|harvtxt}}s should be {{t|efn}}s, but hadn't started focusing on that yet. [[User:Elrondil|Elrondil]] ([[User talk:Elrondil|talk]]) 02:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::While the Ritchie source it is a very, very good paper, I totally agree, three refs to it is a little over-the-top.😁 <br/>Ok, given this approbation, and unless someone objects in the next 24h or so, I'll remove the Sources section, and change the Ritchie refs etc. to <nowiki>{{cite}}</nowiki>s. [[User:Chumpih|<span style="text-shadow: 2px 2.5px 3px #448811bb">Chumpih</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Chumpih|t]]</sup> 06:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:But what are "standard Cites"? 😀 There is no such thing in Wikipedia and everyone does what they want anyway. [[User:Elrondil|Elrondil]] ([[User talk:Elrondil|talk]]) 02:58, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::Ah, true, true! [[User:Chumpih|<span style="text-shadow: 2px 2.5px 3px #448811bb">Chumpih</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Chumpih|t]]</sup> 06:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
| |||